Frost Vs Fire

Your Frost? Why?

Why do you spec Frost?

Fire do more DPS!!! Learn to spec?




These questions do i get at a daily basis now days.
Getting f*¨ng annoing really
And what ever i say to my defence they wont listen, (even got kiked out from a hc run cuz i was frost and not fire).

So on one of the karazhan runs we had i tryed to be fire to see if it was so great that everyone says it is.

The result was (on Attumen):

+
More damage done per fireball than frostbolt.

-
Died.
Had no mana after half fight so i had to pot and evocate.

On one aoe boss(like Auras and so on)(Netherspite):

+
More damage done per fireball than frostbolt.

-
Wiped at the start or at the first netherphase



There i did not have the temper to go fire anymore and specd frost again.
The next try on karazhan had thes results (same bosses).


Attumen:

+
Had mana the whole fight and did not need to pot
Had more crit % than in fire and more crit damage than fire

-
Less damage per frostbolt than fireball
Did not have the +%damage from scorch


Netherspite:

+
Same as above
Had "Ice Barrier" to help me not taking damage from the aura(helping healers to not go oom)
could Ice block twice to protect me from netherbreath

-

Less damage per frostbolt than fireball
Did not have the +%damage from scorch



As you can see did frost help me survie and countinue dps.

And this is what i tell the ones that fire is better:

You survive a lot longer in frost than you do in fire, and that means that you can dps a lot longer than in fire and will surpass them.


I do on otherhand aggre on this:

Fire DO more damage on short amoung of times, so they are better at killing of adds and thras mobs than frost is.




This is my point of Fire VS Frost